NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE SEMINAR Using Plan Reasoning in the Generation of Plan Descriptions Michael Young CMU (Faculty candidate) in 402A Withers at 3:30pm on Jan 30th, 1998 Abstract Intelligent systems are often called upon to form plans that specify their own or other agents' activities. For these systems, the ability to describe plans to people in natural ways is an essential aspect of their interface. There is a mismatch, however, in the level of detail present in the simplest of plans and the detail found in people's descriptions of them. As a result, computer systems responsible for automatically generating descriptions of plans must pay careful attention to the interaction between the quality of a description and the quantity of information it contains. In the first part of the talk, I'll present Clia, the Cooperative Plan Identification Architecture --- a computational model that generates concise textual descriptions of plans. Clia generates plan descriptions by heuristic search, using a model of the user's plan reasoning process, her plan-related preferences and her reasoning resource bounds to produce descriptions that are at once concise and effective. This approach defines a computational model in which computer systems and human users are implicit collaborators in their communication about a plan. A user interprets a concise plan description by filling in the missing detail using plan reasoning. A cooperative system selects the content of a plan description based on an expectation that the user is able to complete the description in much the same way that a planning system completes a partial plan. The Clia architecture has been empirically evaluated in an experiment which I'll describe in the second part of the talk. In this experiment, human subjects were given written instructions produced by Clia and by alternative approaches; the subjects were then asked to carry out the instructions within a virtual environment. The results of this experiment clearly showed that subjects following instructions produced by Clia performed their tasks with fewer execution errors and achieved a higher percentage of their tasks' goals than did subjects following instructions produced by the alternative methods. Host: James Lester